🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.